Pages

Friday, 29 June 2018

Week 28 - Influence of Law & Ethics in Practice


Activity 4: Legal and ethical contexts in my digital practice
Step 1 (What):
Parents transported students to and from a sporting event involving their children and helped supervise other children at the event. Teacher (myself) was not attending the event because of the small number of children involved. While at the event parents took photographs of children competing and emailed them to myself to put in the school newsletter. My role was the organiser and teacher responsible for the children (from my class). I needed parents to transport, supervise and provide photos to share with school community.
Step 2 (So What):
Parents at school have signed a digital agreement in which they have allowed their children’s photographs to be used in our school newsletter, school blogs and in school assemblies. They have not allowed other parents to post or keep photos on phones of their children.
The ethical dilemma is that once the photos are shared with the teacher (and school), they should be removed from the parent’s phone. They do not have permission to keep photographs of other children on their phone or use them on their personal social media. It is my duty to protect the children in my care (and to remain professional and follow our school’s child protection policy agreement).
Solutions
I had an informal chat and asked the parent in question to delete the photos from their phone (which they did) and asked them not post any photos of other children on their social media accounts (which they had not done). I was slightly aware of potential negative reactions, but felt it was the professionally correct decision to make, not an emotional one.
Possible consequences of this could have been negative reactions from the parent (perhaps a feeling of being accused of potentially doing something with the photos?) and future refusal to help at sporting events by transporting and supervising children. Thankfully this was not the case.
Other solutions could have been to do nothing (rule of optimism and hope that they would delete them and not post to any social media) or to arrange a meeting with the principal and ask her to deal with the matter (more formal). Implications of ignoring the fact could have been that if photos had been posted on social media, it would be a failure to inform the parent on my part that led to this happening and could potentially be damaging to my reputation rather than to the parents reputation. Arranging a meeting with the principal would have taken the situation to a level that although keeping procedural and formal, could damage the relationship and trust between teacher and parent and lead to the parent in the future being unwilling to help or communicate closely about important matters.
Step 3 (Now What):
 Our Code of professional responsibility sets out the shared expectations of our profession that we aspire to and have agreed to uphold. It reminds us of our obligations and responsibilities to others and the need to demonstrate high standards of professional behaviour in all we do. In this instance, digital agreements made between parents, teachers and children needed to be upheld and followed. It is my duty as a profession to protect the children in our care and follow our child protection policy.
It is hard to see what else I could do in the future, the community likes to hear and see the news that children are involved in and often these events take place where a teacher can not always be present and require parent help and supervision. I think the next step is to have parents sign an agreement (when they are supervising children at out of school events) not to use photographs taken on personal social media accounts and to delete photographs from mobile devices that do not involve their own children following events within a week. Consequences could be less parental willingness to take photographs, but unlikely, or parents not being willing to supervise other children, again unlikely because the events involve their own children too.
*I have used Rolfe et al.’s (2001) reflective model above
References

Ehrich, L. C. , Kimber M., Millwater, J. & Cranston, N. (2011). Ethical dilemmas: a model to understand teacher practice, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 17:2, 173-185, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2011.539794
Education Council. (2017). Our Code Our Standards. Retrieved from: https://educationcouncil.org.nz/sites/default/file...
Ministry of Education. (2015). DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY Safe and responsible use in schools. Wellington: New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Sch…
Rolfe et al.’s (2001) Reflective Model. Retrieved from https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/ReflectiveModelRolfe.pdf

1 comment:

  1. Nickaulas Gray15 July 2018 at 22:43

    A tricky problem Bernard! Even when on trips with my parents I often encourage them to share pictures with me so I have a large pool to draw from for Newsletters and other public sharing. I need to consider this and ensure I have the parents delete pictures in the future. I also need to find a better place than my own computer to store these photos. They have a value as the children progress through the school but not something to keep for 8 years. Thanks for your honest sharing.

    ReplyDelete

To support my learning I ask you to comment as follows:
1. Something positive - Begin with a greeting. Talk about something you like about what I have shared.
2. Thoughtful - A comment that will mean something to me to let me know you read/watched or listened to what I had to say. - use any language.
3. Something helpful - Give me some ideas for next time or ask me a question.
Encourage me to make another post